Candyfloss courses
Home ] About us ] Alphabetical archive ] Archeology ] Author submission screen ] Book reviews ] Canoeing ] correspondents ] date archive ] East Midlands ] Economics ] Education ] Environment ] Feminisim ] Fresh ] Geology ] Health ] hit counts ] House swaps ] Jokes ] iLinks ] Love ] Media ] Obituaries ] Paleontology ] Past thoughts ] Politics ] Poetry ] Quotes ] Religion ] Sex ] Site Awards ] Smartertimes past ] Spain ] Trade Unions ]

You have reached iGreens.org.uk.  In December 2006 we moved to iGreens.org with faster servers and discussion boards.  Click here to follow us.  

Home ] Up ]

 

It had to happen. Graduates, poor darlings, are finding it tougher to get jobs. Cost­-conscious companies are clamping down on recruitment, prompting a 4 per cent drop in vacancies for graduates this year. But just as demand is falling, supply is rising: there was a 5.4 per cent increase to 358,000 in the number of people taking up full-time university courses last autumn.

This disequilibrium reflects the Government's view that all job-seekers would be better off with degree certificates. So we're now pushing young people into further education who, quite frankly, should not be there. The upshot is a boom in joke subjects at third-rate institutions - a cruel trick on the teenagers who sign up for them. These candy-floss courses are invariably blighted by a mix of high drop-out rates and low employment prospects.

Students who last the distance often end up heavily in debt, but their smoke-and-mirror qualifications do not fool employers. It takes most personnel officers a nanosecond to work out that a double first in maths and physics from Cambridge is preferable to a dodgy third in flower arranging from Toxteth University (previously an inner-city college for reformed shoplifters).

In America, which has hundreds of so-called universities (some are not much more than minor technical schools), blue-chip employers learnt a long while ago how to rank them by quality, creating a premier division that includes the eight Ivy Leaguers and 30 to 40 other five-star colleges. Many UK companies are now doing likewise, concentrating their recruitment drive primarily on graduates from the Russell Group (Britain's top 19 universities from a total of nearly 100) and then sifting them further by weeding out applicants with weak results in flaky subjects.

I'm dismayed to learn that while the number of students starting courses in chemistry and civil engi­neering dropped sharply in September, those taking media studies rose by 22 per cent. For parents whose offspring have just left home to embark on a media studies degree, there's no easy way for me to tell you this. I've spent almost my entire career in journalism - the BBC, Sunday Business, The Sunday Times and The Sunday Telegraph and I have yet to meet anyone with an editorial job whose first degree was in media studies. I really do mean nobody.

Instead of squandering time and money on university courses with less substance than a soufflé, many young people would be belier off learning traditional manual skills, the demand for which has not been eliminated by technological advance. In Greater London, you've got more chance of meeting a yeti than finding a high-quality roofer with time on his hands who's not going to nick the contents of your shed when you leave him alone for 10 minutes. And guess what? Pay rates reflect that.

Britain needs an educated work force, but there has to be a purpose to higher education. Creating a generation of burger-flippers with bachelor degrees in bun filling and portion-control is a criminal waste of scarce resources.

Jeff Randall  (Business column, Jan 2002)

 

Home ] Up ]

You have reached iGreens.org.uk.  In December 2006 we moved to iGreens.org with faster servers and discussion boards.  Click here to follow us.  

Send mail to enquiries@igreens.org.uk  with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: September 26, 2006