GM Good?  GM Wonderful
Home ] Bush talks sense on environment ] Campaigns ] Commentary ] Doomsday predictions ] Earthquake News ] Electromagnetic radiation ] Environmental news ] GM stuff ] Fishing ] Forests ] Global warming ] Green watch ] Hunting stuff ] Lomborg ] Mining Industry news ] Miscellaneous ] Mountains ] Planning ] I remember it well ] Nuclear power ] Oil ] People who should know better ] precautionary principle ] Privatisation ] Railways ] Roads ] "Things are getting better" stuff ] Tourism ] Water ] Wind power ]

You have reached iGreens.org.uk.  In December 2006 we moved to iGreens.org with faster servers and discussion boards.  Click here to follow us.  

Home ] Up ]

Are you for life or are you for death?

The honest answer from some of the greens would be: for death.

The biggest eye-opener for me at the WSSD was on Genetically Modified (GM) Crops.  My training is in physics and engineering and so I do not know much about the biological sciences.  I had listened vaguely to arguments for and against GM crops, thinking on balance that they were probably quite a good thing, but now I have changed my mind.

What changed it was listening to three small farmers, one from the Philippines, one from India and one from northern KwaZulu-Natal (one Mr Buthelezi).  They were part of discussions held by the Sustainable Development Network.  All three told the same story, and the story startled me.

They are all small farmers, depending for survival on little crops of maize and cotton.  Their crops were attacked continuously by two ruthless enemies, the bollworm and the corn borer.  They devastated the crops. To try to control them the farmers used large amounts of pesticides, which destroyed all the beneficial insects, poisoned the soil, damaged their health and killed one of their workers.  The farmers were desperate.  And then they were given GM seeds.

It changed their lives.  They were Bt seeds (Bacillus thuringiensis), which provide the plants with a natural defense against the pests.  The crop yields doubled or trebled.  They did not have to use pesticides any more, which saved them money and improved their health.  Beneficial insects came back.  For the first time ever, these small farmers began to make enough money to improve their living standards.  They benefited and the environment benefited.

That night on the TV, I saw a sleek, rich, young white British woman from Greenpeace being interviewed on the subject of GM crops.  She said they should not be used until we had done years more testing.  The message of death from Greenpeace was clear: "You darkies must go hungry, poison your soil and destroy your biodiversity until we, the wise white Bwanas from Europe, decide that GM crops are acceptable."

The sickening, condescending, callous, racist arrogance of Greenpeace!

Meanwhile, I have changed my mind on GM crops. I used to believe they were probably a good thing, I now believe they are a wonderful thing.

Here’s to science, life and GM crops!  Here’s to a healthy planet for all our people, plants and animals

Andrew Kenny 7 Sept 2002

 

Home ] Up ]

You have reached iGreens.org.uk.  In December 2006 we moved to iGreens.org with faster servers and discussion boards.  Click here to follow us.  

Send mail to enquiries@igreens.org.uk  with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: September 20, 2006