|
You have reached iGreens.org.uk. In December 2006 we moved to iGreens.org with faster servers and discussion boards. Click here to follow us. |
|
Sport and commercial fishermen frequently fight over the right to fish, each blaming the other for failing to conserve stocks. A study from the Centre for Private Conservation on the history of the salmon fisheries in Scotland gives a possible solution. Dr. Iain A. Robertson, describes the conservation of a natural resource over hundreds of years. The struggles he describes remain relevant today - how to accommodate conservation and commerce, competing users of natural resources, and radical changes in the technologies used to harvest these resources? The Scottish approach has been to rely on private property rights. "From the first enactments the Scots law has devolved to private individuals and associations the responsibility for salmon conservation." This devolution has not been pure. Private action, politics and legislative change have all affected the salmon fisheries. However the policy implications are clear. Not only will more people invest in conservation if the rights to a natural resource, like a salmon fishery, are comprehensive and secure, but such clearly defined rights also reduce conflict between different types of owners and investors. In the Scottish salmon fisheries, the most successful and conservation-minded initiatives came from those who saw an opportunity to capitalise on conservation, from John Richardson’s efforts to monitor the impacts of netting on salmon populations in the eighteenth century, to anglers who bought up commercial netting rights in the twentieth. When opportunities arose to either ban conflicting harvesting methods or simply to expropriate others’ rights, conservation fell by the wayside and innovation focused simply on catching more fish. Scottish salmon history shows that conflict-resolving conservation-oriented solutions are more likely to evolve when the law speaks decisively on the definition of rights and fosters private market solutions. Recreational vs. commercial conflicts remain commonplace. The Scottish history demonstrates that if the rights to fish were stronger, anglers and commercial fishermen would turn their attention to protecting and enhancing the very fish stocks that they both depend on. Salmon Conservation in Scotland: A History of Legislative
Tradition and Private Action by Iain
A. Robertson Read
the full article here |
|
You have reached iGreens.org.uk. In December 2006 we moved to iGreens.org with faster servers and discussion boards. Click here to follow us.
Send mail to enquiries@igreens.org.uk
with
questions or comments about this web site.
|